Since late January of 2012, the Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard has as soon as every week featured a “Mainstream Media Scream” choice in his “Washington Secrets and techniques” column. For every choose, normally posted on-line on Monday, I present a proof and advocate a “scream” ranking (scale of 1 to 5).

This put up incorporates the “Liberal Media Screams” beginning in January 2021.

> For all of 2020. For all of 2019. For all of  2018. (Re-named “Liberal Media Scream” as of June 11, 2018.) “Mainstream Media Screams” for:

> July-December 2017 posts; January through June 2017; July to December 2016; for January to June 2016; for July to December 2015; for January to June 2015. (2012-2014 are featured on MRC.org: For 2014; for June 17, 2013 through the end of 2013. And for January 31, 2012 through June 11, 2013.)

Verify Bedard’s “Washington Secrets” blog for the most recent selection and his different Washington insider posts. Every week, this web page might be up to date with Bedard’s newest instance of the worst bias of the week.

(For extra of the worst liberal media bias, browse the Media Research Center’s Notable Quotables with compilations of the most recent outrageous, typically humorous, quotes within the liberal media.)

 

■ New on August 23: Liberal Media Scream: CNN common says Biden’s doing a heck of a job

See the posting on the Washington Examiner‘s site the place you may watch the video and skim Baker’s evaluation. Every week later, Bedard’s article might be posted right here.

 

■ August 16: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC ‘skilled’ says GOP attempting to make migrants ‘disappear’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream contains a key MSNBC visitor who stated Republicans try to “disappear” nonwhites and liberal migrants from voting rolls.

MSNBC’s Ali Velshi on Saturday featured a visitor who charged “the politics of Republican redistricting actually displays a sort of ugly logic of elimination” wherein “they’re attempting to vanish sure voices and populations.”

Cristina Beltran, affiliate professor at New York College’s Division of Social and Cultural Evaluation, stated, “Stephen Miller couldn’t do it, or Trump couldn’t do it” — however following new census numbers, they’ll attempt by way of redistricting.

Beltran, creator of the e-book, Cruelty as Citizenship: How Migrant Struggling Sustains White Democracy, stated that “the GOP actually can’t make the nation whiter, so that they’re utilizing redistricting to strip residents of their energy and to make Congress look much less like America.”

From Saturday morning’s Velshi on MSNBC:

ALI VELSHI: Cristina, when folks — the census shouldn’t shock most individuals who observe, such as you do, inhabitants and demographics in America. However, I feel that the conclusion is counterintuitive. Most individuals say, ‘Nicely, if the census says we’re extra various, our illustration ought to get extra various.’ In actual fact, it’s more likely to get much less various.

CRISTINA BELTRAN: Precisely, precisely, and I feel that’s an actual problem right here is that the census, one hand, is telling us one thing we already know: That America is a deeply multiracial nation, however the politics of Republican redistricting actually displays a sort of ugly logic of elimination, proper? The place they’re attempting to vanish sure voices and populations, proper? And so, I feel they’re attempting to vanish plenty of Individuals politically, proper? Stephen Miller couldn’t do it, or Trump couldn’t do it of their politics in a whole method, although they tried with anti-immigration politics, however the GOP actually can’t make the nation whiter, so that they’re utilizing redistricting to strip residents of their energy and to make Congress look much less like America.

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “The one ‘ugly logic’ right here is from Ali Velshi and MSNBC of their resolution to function a visitor with such an unsightly tackle a regular observe after each census when the get together which dominates in a state will get to do some ‘gerrymandering.’ It’s hardly the nefarious deed instructed by Beltran and hardly distinctive to 1 get together. However depart it to MSNBC to present it a racist tinge whereas tossing in some vitriol towards Donald Trump and Stephen Miller.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ August 9: Liberal Media Scream: CNN’s Acosta sneers, ‘Name it the DeSantis variant’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN’s Jim Acosta going full liberal bias in attacking Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s dealing with of the most recent coronavirus outbreak.

On CNN Saturday afternoon, Acosta blamed Republican politicians for COVID-19 deaths, significantly DeSantis.

“As a substitute of the delta variant, why not name it the DeSantis variant?” the anchor stated. Acosta, identified for his hostility to President Donald Trump when he lined the White Home, didn’t say the identical factor about New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who earlier had a COVID loss of life outbreak on his arms.

With an identical picture on display, Acosta instructed, “We may promote beer koozies that say ‘Don’t Florida My Fauci,’” (a play on koozies that say ‘Don’t Fauci My Florida’) earlier than snidely concluding with how the cash raised might be used “to assist pay for all of the funerals that might be coming.”

Acosta, on CNN Newsroom, on Saturday afternoon, Aug. 7:

“Folks mustn’t must die so some politicians can personal the libs. They’re not proudly owning anyone, however they could find yourself proudly owning the pandemic, as a result of they’re prolonging it. Maybe it’s time to begin naming these new variants which may be popping out after them. As a substitute of the delta variant, why not name it the DeSantis variant? We may promote beer koozies that say ‘Don’t Florida My Fauci’ and use the cash to assist pay for all of the funerals that might be coming within the days to return.”

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “Acosta is simply furthering his picture as extra of a clownish political hack than any sort of fair-minded journalist. If deaths from COVID-9 are such a severe concern, which they’re, why is he, an anchor for a nationwide cable information channel, making such a crass political insult which hardly reveals respect for the science?”

Ranking: THREE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ August 2: Liberal Media Scream: New CNN low, evaluating Trump ‘cult’ to Jonestown bloodbath

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN’s Brian Stelter’s Trump Derangement Syndrome hitting a brand new low, inviting a comparability of the “cult” of Trump to the Jim Jones cult killings in Jonestown, Guyana, in 1978.

On his Sunday present, Dependable Sources, the liberal media nag introduced aboard Rep. Jackie Speier, who survived the Jonestown bloodbath, to equate the “cult of Trump” with the mass murder-suicide of 918 followers of Rev. Jim Jones. “I wished to listen to her ideas in regards to the comparability, the notion of the cult of Trump,” Stelter stated in organising the welcoming California lawmaker.

Speier, who was shot 5 occasions as she tried to flee at an airfield when she was a member of the workers of Rep. Leo Ryan, welcomed the spin. “There isn’t any query” you “may evaluate” the 2 “charismatic leaders,” she stated.

Stelter performed alongside: “It’s scary to listen to that when you’ve got noticed the Trump phenomenon, you’ve got seen similarities to Jonestown.”

Stelter had opened the phase by relaying suggestions from worldwide viewers asking, “Why doesn’t the American media simply name out Trump for what he’s, name Trump fandom for what it’s? Generally they use the phrase, cult.”

From the beginning of the phase on the Aug. 1 Dependable Sources on CNN:

BRIAN STELTER: Welcome again to Dependable Sources, dwell within the U.S. and all around the globe. And one of many nice issues about being proven on CNN Worldwide is that I hear from viewers who observe American political dysfunction from an outsider’s standpoint. These residents in different international locations typically electronic mail me and say, , why doesn’t the American media simply name out Trump for what he’s, name Trump fandom for what it’s? Generally they use the phrase, cult. I do know that’s a delicate phrase. It doesn’t come up lots in American information protection.

So, I wished to place it to an skilled, an unlucky skilled, Congresswoman Jackie Speier began out her profession in politics, working for a lawmaker. She’s on a fact-finding mission to Jonestown. She sadly is aware of firsthand in regards to the weight of that phrase, cult. She was in a position to escape along with her life, others weren’t in a position to that day. So, I wished to listen to her ideas in regards to the comparability, the notion of the cult of Trump, particularly within the gentle of January sixth, and the mass delusion that led folks to a riot of lies on Capitol Hill. Once I introduced this up along with her, she didn’t mince phrases.

REP. JACKIE SPEIER: Tright here’s no query that you could possibly evaluate Jim Jones as a charismatic chief, who would carry his congregation collectively, pressured them to do issues that had been unlawful, after which took 900 of them into the jungles of Guyana, the place over the course of time, he then satisfied them that they need to die. I’ve by no means been in a position to say they dedicated suicide as a result of I don’t suppose they had been answerable for their colleges, to be fairly trustworthy with you.

So, you take a look at Donald Trump, charismatic chief, who was in a position to proceed to speak in phrases that appealed to those that are disaffected, disillusioned, and who had been on the lookout for one thing, very like those that turned a part of Jim Jones’s congregation, the Folks’s Temple. They had been misplaced souls. And the one distinction between Jim Jones and Donald Trump is the truth that we now have social media. So, all these folks can discover themselves in ways in which they couldn’t discover themselves earlier than.

So, he mainly was a service provider of deceit, each of them retailers of deceit, each of them making folks not take a look at information, not suppose independently. And sowed a narrative for them that was certainly damaging.

STELTER: It’s scary to listen to that when you’ve got noticed the Trump phenomenon, you’ve got seen similarities to Jonestown.

Brent Baker, vp of analysis and publications for the Media Analysis Heart, explains our weekly choose: “The longer Trump is out of the White Home the extra Trump Derangement Syndrome appears to develop amongst his largest haters within the media, with Stelter taking it to an entire new degree every week. Final week, he featured Carl Bernstein calling Trump a ‘warfare prison.’ This week, Trump’s identical to a cult chief who led tons of of followers to commit mass suicide and homicide a congressman. Solely Trump has by no means performed that. Possibly Stelter ought to look a bit nearer to dwelling to see who’s in a personality-based cult.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ July 26: Liberal Media Scream: The worst of Trump hater Carl Bernstein

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the most recent anti-Trump outburst from Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein — and his worst hits checklist.

Sunday on CNN’s Dependable Sources, his important venting venue, he overvalued his prior assaults on former President Donald Trump, claiming that the Republican is a “warfare prison.”

His over-the-top invective towards Trump is nothing new, as a fast journey by way of the CNN archive reveals. In 2017, he declared of Trump’s resolution to take away the FBI director, “It is a probably extra harmful state of affairs than Watergate.” In 2020, he was repeating his Watergate comparability as he charged Trump allies had “now joined arms with a tyrant.” Final fall, he described Trump’s response to COVID as “homicidal negligence” earlier than declaring “we’re witnessing the Mad King within the remaining days of his reign.”

Our Liberal Media Scream associate Brent Baker, the vp of the Media Analysis Heart, drew up a listing of Bernstein’s biggest anti-Trump hits:

   ♦ “I feel it is a probably extra harmful state of affairs than Watergate, and we’re at a really harmful second. And that’s as a result of we’re wanting on the risk that the president of america and people round him throughout an election marketing campaign colluded with a hostile international energy to undermine the premise of our democracy: free elections.” — Dependable Sources, Could 14, 2017.

   ♦ “Let’s take a look at what Watergate was as a result of it was a couple of prison president who acted as a tyrant. And what we have now right here now’s the Senate of america, by way of the Republican management and membership, has now joined arms with a tyrant.” — CNN Newsroom, Jan. 31, 2020.

   ♦ “His response has been homicidal negligence. He has failed to guard the American folks and reasonably to place his personal curiosity of reelection and holding on to the workplace of the presidency in entrance of the well being and well-being of the American folks.” — CNN Newsroom, Oct. 3, 2020.

   ♦ “We’re witnessing the Mad King within the remaining days of his reign, prepared to scorch the Earth of his nation and produce down the entire system to undermine our entire democracy, strip it of its legitimacy, poison the boldness of our folks in our establishments and the structure for Donald Trump’s personal petulant, egocentric, rabid ends.” — CNN New Day, Nov. 20, 2020.

   ♦ “I feel we have to calmly step again and perhaps take a look at Trump in a unique context. He’s America’s, our personal American warfare prison, of a form we’ve by no means skilled earlier than … In worldwide legislation, there have been, quote, ‘crimes towards humanity.’ I feel what we’re speaking about, Trump’s crimes as an American warfare prison in his personal nation that he has perpetrated upon our folks.” — Dependable Sources, Sunday.

Baker explains our weekly choose: “Bernstein is a one-note musician, attempting each week to ramp up his singularly targeted anger to get some consideration. With a lot unhinged animus for Trump, it’s exhausting to think about anybody considers his rants something greater than leisure from a man attempting, however failing, to match Trump’s ability at making a detrimental public picture for his opponents by way of inventive terminology.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ July 19: Liberal Media Scream: Press ought to ‘transfer on’ from steadiness to liberal advocacy

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream contains a Washington Put up columnist telling it like it’s: Liberal advocacy within the media is the proper bias.

On CNN’s Dependable Sources present, Perry Bacon Jr. argued the information media “ought to transfer on from” caring about attracting simply as many Republicans as Democrats to learn or view their reporting. Choosing up on a column he wrote final week, Bacon stated the “core mission” of the media is to current “information” and “an evidence-based view of the world.”

However his “information,” after all, overlap with the priorities of liberals, not unusual for Washington Put up columnists who’re given extra freedom of their work. For instance, he stated, “We within the media are biased by way of we assist vaccines. We within the media rent LGBT staff. We’re biased towards bans towards trans or homosexual folks.”

Give credit score to the Washington Put up for highlighting the bias of its scribes. In Bacon’s bio, for instance, it affords up his protection space. Beneath “The Democratic Get together,” it says, “The Democratic Get together is usually transferring in a pro-equality (racial, financial, class, gender, sexual id) course.” Beneath “The Republican Get together,” it reads, “The Republican Get together is transferring in an anti-democratic, anti-Democrats course.”

Bacon on Sunday’s Dependable Sources on CNN:

“They need to transfer on from this concept that they’re attempting to, , the viewers is attempting to get equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats or to not offend Mitch McConnell’s workplace or no matter it’s, and to essentially get targeted on what’s our core mission. And I’d argue the core mission is to current information, current proof, current an evidence-based view of the world, and to additionally, for my part, defend the concepts of a democracy and a multiracial democracy, I feel, is a part of what the media must be doing. What that appears like, I feel, is defending and being unabashed. Vaccines work. Joe Biden gained the election. Black lives do matter, and we must be trustworthy about when black individuals are discriminated towards unfairly. And to type of begin from a spot of, do we have now some clear-cut values we will articulate — articulate these indirectly on our web sites, in our programming, to be trustworthy about like, we’re attempting to battle this bias factor.

“We’re biased by way of information. We within the media are biased by way of we assist vaccines. We within the media rent LGBT staff. We’re biased towards bans towards trans or homosexual folks. So we might be trustworthy about these biases, and type of, we’re in favor of a multiracial democracy. That’s why journalists behave the best way they did when Trump — we’re in favor of the one who gained the election being president. So as soon as we’re trustworthy about these issues, which will flip off some folks, however it should assist us be higher as establishments and higher as journalists if our first aim is, listed below are the values we acknowledged we try to implement, after which secondary, we’ll take the viewers who embraces these values.

“That doesn’t imply our values are Democratic and never Republican, however our values that we’re speaking about are small-D democratic and never authoritarian or one thing like that. So I feel if we get clear on values, after all, the media is for, towards authoritarian folks like Trump. The media can’t exist in a practical method with out having, , with out having a free press, which dictators normally oppose.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “I suppose Bacon ought to get some factors for honesty, for articulating how, presumably, lots of his colleagues really feel, that equity and steadiness must be damned in favor of declaring liberal presumptions because the factual actuality and dismiss opposite views as unworthy. However removed from fixing journalism, Bacon’s prescription will guarantee its demise as media figures now not fake to be something however left-wing political activists.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ July 12: No Liberal Media Scream this week.

 

■ July 5: Liberal Media Scream: ABC analysts huff at justices over voting resolution

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options two ABC This Week commentators making a brand new argument for huge open voting — some folks can’t afford sufficient gasoline to get meals and vote.

The Thursday Supreme Courtroom ruling, upholding two provisions of Arizona’s voting guidelines which required folks to vote at their very own precinct and barred poll harvesting, irked the 2 who cited anecdotes about difficulties encountered by poor and minority voters.

LZ Granderson, an ABC Information podcaster, ESPN contributor, and Los Angeles Instances columnist, stated the justices had been out of contact as a result of they aren’t poor: “They’re all privileged.” He recalled his “mother scraping collectively 50 cents, 75 cents, a greenback only for gasoline to get to a grocery retailer” and so “now you’re forcing minorities to determine” between attending to a polling place or shopping for groceries.

Washington Put up reporter Mary Jordan cited misdeeds she noticed in Mississippi with “every kind of soiled methods being performed about closing polls, switching the place you’re purported to be, telling folks they’re within the improper place even when they’re in the fitting place.”

From the Sunday, July 4 roundtable after host Martha Raddatz characterised the ruling as “not precisely consistent with public opinion,” an evaluation primarily based on an ABC Information/Washington Put up ballot:

LZ Granderson: “No, after all not, however they don’t actually care about public opinion, proper? In the event that they did, then all of this laws can be checked out in a different way. You understand, the factor that actually frustrates me most is the justices acknowledged that these new legal guidelines does influence minorities. They didn’t deny that side of it. They only stated that the inconvenience of it isn’t so nice. Nicely, they’re all privileged. And I grew up poor. I bear in mind my mother scraping collectively 50 cents, 75 cents, a greenback only for gasoline to get to a grocery retailer. Whenever you try this to polling locations, now you’re forcing minorities to determine whether or not or not they’re going to take a position cash, gasoline cash, to get to the polling locations that are actually additional away or do I take advantage of this gasoline cash to get to the grocery retailer or do I to get to work. They’re privileged, saying that this doesn’t inconvenience them sufficient. Nicely, how are you aware? When was the final time you had been that poor?”

Mary Jordan: “I’d like to speak about, I went down in Mississippi, and I noticed this. And on the morning of the election, folks would end up and the polling place can be closed within the place the place there have been plenty of Democratic voters. And so the query then was do I drive, so I spend one other 45 minutes within the automotive to go there and wait in a extremely lengthy line? There’s every kind of soiled methods being performed about closing polls, switching the place you’re purported to be, telling folks they’re within the improper place even when they’re in the fitting place. I feel if folks actually knew what was occurring, as a result of it differs state by state and county by county, they might suppose, what, it’s July 4th right here. It’s all about voting, proper? It’s essentially the most elementary of rights. We had the Boston tea get together as a result of we couldn’t vote, and we had been getting taxed. And it’s sort of surprising that proper now, lots of people don’t have the identical entry to votes as different Individuals.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Granderson and Jordan appeared to be looking for anecdotes to justify their place towards very fundamental voter integrity guidelines and got here up with fairly weak ones. Making everybody vote at their native precinct is the last word in equity and requires the least bus cash whereas eliminating a lot of alternatives for confusion and fraud. As for all of the misdeeds Jordan noticed in areas ‘the place there have been plenty of Democratic voters,’ which power folks to ‘spend one other 45 minutes within the automotive,’ that’s simply what the Arizona native precinct rule is supposed to stop. And which get together controls the election methods just about in every single place the place minorities and Democrats are the bulk? It’s not wealthy, privileged Supreme Courtroom justices.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ June 28: Liberal Media Scream: Taxpayer-subsidized PBS is extra DNC than the DNC

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the clearest instance but that taxpayer-subsidized PBS is changing into an arm of the Democratic Nationwide Committee.

Showing on Meet the Press, activist journalist Yamiche Alcindor echoed the DNC speaking factors on state-passed voting reforms, ignoring a number of truth checks which have proven that some, notably Georgia, have adopted extra progressive voting adjustments than President Joe Biden’s dwelling state or uber-liberal Connecticut.

As a substitute, the brand new host of PBS’s Washington Week and the White Home correspondent for PBS NewsHour declared “an existential disaster in America” and went as far as to say that states are taking votes away from folks “if we don’t like the best way that you simply voted.”

And, as she has earlier than, she gave the president a bit recommendation, this time to “speed up his nominees to the courts.”

From the roundtable on Sunday’s Meet the Press:

“Whenever you discuss to people who find themselves actually acquainted with the interested by this, it’s that Democrats notice that they may, that it’s not going to solely be solved in a legislative method. There must be a judicial and a court docket battle forward. And after I’m speaking to civil rights activists, they are saying they need to see two particular issues: One, the DOJ actually going after state legislatures. So, it’s to say you cannot simply, not solely voters, not solely suppress folks’s votes, however nullify folks’s votes. So, that may’t be the best way that America works. The second factor that they need to see is extra judges on the court docket. They need to see President Biden speed up his nominees to the courts. So, I feel that’s additionally the place that is going.

“That is an existential disaster in America. Who can really get the entry to vote? Republicans in state legislatures are saying if you happen to, basically, and critics would say that ‘if we don’t like the best way that you simply voted, we’ll take away your vote.’ And that, I feel, is an actual downside. If you happen to take a look at Philadelphia state legislatures and in the event that they, and whether or not or not they’ll even nullify one million votes in Philly — that might be an issue and an enormous downside.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker defined our weekly choose: “If there was any doubt remaining about whether or not Alcindor is a journalist or a Democratic political activist pretending to be a journalist, she eradicated it with this bombast, which has no foundation in actuality and echos essentially the most excessive rhetoric of far-left activists. No person’s vote is being taken away anyplace. In actual fact, whereas some Republican states have set guidelines to ensure a number of days of early voting, some states, equivalent to Democratic-run Connecticut, haven’t any early voting.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ June 21: Liberal Media Scream: Chuck Todd calls parent-led opposition to crucial race idea faux

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the dismissal by NBC’s Chuck Todd of parent-led opposition to the educating of crucial race idea in faculties.

“It’s manufactured,” he stated, brushing apart all of the protests, even many close to Washington the place Todd reviews from, of public college dad and mom lining as much as oppose CRT. His Meet the Press visitor, pollster Cornell Belcher, went additional, blaming former President Trump and “tribalism.”

In actual fact, polls present that even within the liberal Washington suburbs, the bulk oppose educating the revisionism that America is mainly racist.

From the roundtable on the June 20 Meet the Press, with feedback first from PBS NewsHour chief correspondent Amna Nawaz and Republican pollster Brad Todd:

AMNA NAWAZ: Yeah. And particular to this concept of crucial race idea, I’ve to let you know, I simply spent a while reporting on this county in Virginia about an hour exterior of Washington. And to your level, that is one thing that’s mobilizing folks and resonating very deeply. It was a couple of 100 diploma day. Dozens and dozens and dozens of oldsters, principally white, on this largely prosperous county, confirmed up to a faculty board assembly, for a lot of of them, the very first college board assembly they’d ever attended, particularly due to this one concern.

BRAD TODD: That’s vital to notice, that you simply talked about crucial race idea a pair occasions. It is a parent-led backlash on the grassroots degree.

CHUCK TODD: It’s manufactured, after which type of appears to have been lit, the fireplace was lit.

BRAD TODD: I disagree. I feel it began as a result of dad and mom have had it with the training paperwork after COVID. They’re fed up with it. They have a tendency to belief Democrats in relation to training funding, however they belief Republicans on training accountability. I feel that what the backlash you’re seeing on crucial race idea in faculties is one other instance of oldsters attempting to carry educators accountable.

CORNELL BELCHER: It’s coordinated. It’s aggressive. It’s intentional, proper? That is, that is a part of the tribalism play. The crucial race idea is one more device within the racial tribal boogeyman’s toolbox to drive and inflame tribalism, which Republicans suppose helps them in elections. That is Trump 2.0. That is, it’s a continuation of this, proper? Essential race idea is an, an arcane type of very best. Why is it entrance and middle proper now? The identical motive that Mitch McConnell assaults Stacey Abrams when she got here out for the voting invoice. It’s racial. It’s tribalism. We’ve seen it develop beneath Trump. And that is half and partial of it. They usually suppose this helps ignite their base. There’s no method this isn’t grassroots. And, Brad, that is organized and is being paid for.

CHUCK TODD: However, , Ashley-

BRAD TODD: We’re not superb at organizing something on our facet.

CORNELL BELCHER: You all are higher than us.

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Typical of smug information media figures, dismissing grassroots issues as ‘manufactured’ and racist, as if on their very own dad and mom can’t acknowledge extremist racial educating that can additional divide the nation. And it takes chutzpah for Belcher to accuse conservatives of ‘Trump 2.0’ and using ‘the racial tribal boogeyman’s toolbox to drive and inflame tribalism,’ when liberals have spent the final months racializing efforts to go voter integrity legal guidelines by calling them ‘Jim Crow 2.0.’”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ June 14: Liberal Media Scream: GQ journo says US could also be worse than Russia on human rights

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream contains a prize-winning Russian-born journalist suggesting that President Joe Biden has no standing to problem Russian President Vladimir Putin on human rights.

Julia Ioffe, showing on MSNBC, stated america fails the ethical superiority take a look at due to “voter suppression” and police “consistently” killing black folks.

Ioffe, who writes for GQ and different websites, stated, “It’s a lot tougher to speak to Vladimir Putin about human rights once we nonetheless haven’t cleaned up our mess at dwelling.” And, she added, “Russians are seeing precisely what we’re seeing: the voter suppression legal guidelines, the, , slide towards minority rule, the undermining of our personal democracy.”

Ioffe on Morning Joe as we speak:

“I did need to return rapidly to the purpose of ‘whataboutism.’ After all, it’s a method of not answering the query, however it works on many individuals as a result of they all the time begin with a grain of reality, proper? And, , it’s fascinating. Sure, the Soviet Union consistently talked in regards to the violation of the civil rights of African-Individuals in America within the ’50s and ’60s and even going again to the ’30s. And one of many causes that the Civil Rights Act was handed and that the American president received behind it was to sort of take this card out of the arms of the Soviets.

“And, , President Biden, politically talking, is just not going into this assembly with an awesome hand of playing cards, both. You understand, Russians are seeing precisely what we’re seeing: the voter suppression legal guidelines, the, , slide towards minority rule, the undermining of our personal democracy. So it’s a lot tougher to speak to, , we’re seeing black women and men being killed by police consistently on this nation, so it’s a lot tougher to speak to Vladimir Putin about human rights once we nonetheless haven’t cleaned up our mess at dwelling.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Ioffe not solely returned to ‘whataboutism,’ however she returned to the left-wing’s ethical equivalence between the U.S. and Soviet Union of the Chilly Battle years when all too many journalists had been extra upset by what President Reagan stated in regards to the Soviet Union than the human rights violations dedicated by the Soviets. She’s now justifying Putin’s tackle the U.S. by treating some shortcomings of the U.S., and democratic debate inside our nation about the way to enhance these shortcomings, with a Russian dictator who has little interest in civil rights for anybody as he suppresses dissent, utilizing unjustified incarceration and homicide as his instruments.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ June 7: Liberal Media Scream: CNN’s Stelter offers the complete Monty to Biden’s Jen Psaki

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN media critic Brian Stelter’s “interview” of White Home press secretary Jen Psaki, a show of how the liberal cable channel has whipsawed from ripping the Trump administration to fawning over the Biden crew.

Simply take into account his first query throughout his Sunday present.

“What do you suppose we get improper?” Stelter requested.

That was adopted up with questioning, “what’s your recommendation” for journalists “to remain near the reality on this world of lies?”

Then, after noting that he and Psaki have younger youngsters, he requested, “What sort of nation is that this going to be when they’re our age? Do you concern that, given the craziness we’re seeing from the GOP? Do you concern that for our children, your youngsters and mine?”

Stelter sympathetically arrange the phase, recorded on Friday and aired on Sunday’s Dependable Sources: “On this period of media bunkers and various realities, the White Home press secretary faces some distinctive challenges. So let’s hear from Jen Psaki to get her perspective practically 5 months into the job and about what may lie forward.”

A few of his “questions” to Psaki:

    ♦ “Busy summer season forward, infrastructure, election reform. What does the press get improper when masking Biden’s agenda? Whenever you watch the information, while you learn the information, what do you suppose we get improper?”
    ♦ “For different P.R. professionals who watch what you do, for journalists who watch what you do, what’s your recommendation for them about attempting to remain as near the reality on this world of lies?”
    ♦ “I do know that is typically adversarial, however it additionally must be practical. Is the connection between the White Home and the press corps now at the very least practical in ways in which it wasn’t within the Trump years?” (Psaki: “I feel so.”)
   ♦ “That is what I actually wished to ask you. You talked about your youngsters, you’ve got a daughter going into kindergarten, I’ve a daughter going into pre-Okay. And I feel to myself, what sort of nation is that this going to be when they’re our age? Do you concern that, given the craziness we’re seeing from the GOP? Do you concern that for our children, your youngsters and mine?”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “My how the world has modified from the Trump years when CNN handled White Home officers as enemies who should be discredited. Now, White Home workers are their mates and allies. Stelter must be embarrassed by such a efficiency after years of disdain for Trump’s politics and press secretaries. However he gained’t be. On this interview he acted extra like a groveling scholar craving for his professor’s approval (‘Inform me what I’m doing improper,’ ‘How can we be a truthful as you?’), adopted by attempting to point out his shared disdain for her political opponents, than any sort of journalist holding these in energy to account.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ Could 31: Liberal Media Scream: ‘Some issues could also be true, even when Donald Trump stated them’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream contains a prime critic of the Trump years, ABC’s Jonathan Karl, who lastly stated out loud what supporters of President Donald Trump already knew: The White Home press corps had such contempt for the president that they dismissed every thing he stated.

Or, in Karl’s phrases, “some issues could also be true, even when Donald Trump stated them.”

Karl on Sunday’s This Week grudgingly conceded that Trump could have been appropriate in pointing to a lab in Wuhan, China, because the supply of COVID-19. He blamed Trump, not journalists, for ignoring the lab because the supply due to how Trump used “racist” phrases in describing the virus.

Through the roundtable phase on This Week, after host Martha Raddatz instructed “some folks have egg on their face” for being so dismissive of the chance that the COVID-19 virus got here out of a Chinese language lab, Karl stated:

“Sure, I feel lots of people have egg on their face. This was an concept that was first put ahead by Mike Pompeo, secretary of state, Donald Trump. And look, some issues could also be true, even when Donald Trump stated them. And there was — as a result of Trump was saying a lot else that was simply uncontrolled, and since he was, , making a frankly racist attraction speaking about ‘kung-flu’ and the ‘China virus,’ his notion that he put ahead that this may increasingly have, or that he stated flatly that this got here from that lab, was broadly dismissed. However really, there’s some actual motive — we don’t know, by the best way, we nonetheless don’t know, we completely don’t know, however now, severe individuals are saying it wants a severe inquiry.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Karl stated out loud what everybody already presumed: So many within the Washington press corps had such contempt for President Trump that they dismissed something he stated they might characterize of their minds as coming from foul motives. Thus, journalists proudly rationalized placing their prejudices first. However that meant the media failed in its fundamental responsibility to tell the general public of the very best info out there in regards to the supply of a pandemic which has killed 3.5 million worldwide.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ Could 24: No Liberal Media Scream this week

 

■ Could 17: Liberal Media Scream: Chuck Todd doesn’t wish to be known as liberal, ‘Don’t begin that!’

(Washington Examiner put up)

The query on this week’s Liberal Mainstream Scream is that this: Can NBC Meet the Press host Chuck Todd deal with the reality?

A solution got here in his interview with Texas Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw after Todd hit him for 5 questions on the elimination of Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney because the No. 3 Home chief after she refused to cease criticizing former President Donald Trump on his election fraud claims.

An exacerbated Crenshaw, after watching the liberal media flip the ouster into the subsequent catastrophe for the GOP, blurted out, “You guys within the press love doing this” and “I get it, proper? The press is essentially liberal. They’re largely pro-Democrat.”

Todd wouldn’t hear it and tried to take again the dialog. “No, no, no, no, don’t begin that … There’s nothing lazier. There’s nothing lazier than that,” he stated.

Todd tried repeatedly to get Crenshaw to denounce his Republican colleagues and Trump in a sequence of questions, beginning with asking him to agree that “Liz Cheney was kicked out of management just because she wouldn’t carry the water of former President Trump’s election lies.” He adopted up with “Why ought to anyone consider a phrase you say if the Republican get together itself doesn’t have credibility?” and “Do any of your critiques come throughout as credible if you happen to can’t settle for the elemental incontrovertible fact that our democracy held a free and truthful election?”

He then pressed Crenshaw to backtrack from ever asking courts to assessment some election processes, resulting in this trade on the Sunday program:

CHUCK TODD: This is a matter that many individuals have, is that you simply’re sitting right here attempting to, attempting to say, ‘No, no, no, no, I simply had a selected query,’ but what you probably did will get weaponized by the previous president. Did you see the rantings of him yesterday? And to the purpose the place a Republican official in Maricopa County known as the previous president ‘unhinged.’ You understand, I perceive you guys need to put this behind you, however he’s the chief of your get together, and he doesn’t cease speaking about this nonsense.

REP. DAN CRENSHAW: Chuck, the one — look, he’s one in all many leaders within the get together. He’s a former president. We’re 5 months into President Biden’s presidency, and there’s a time to maneuver on. And look, you guys within the press love doing this, and I, and I get it, proper? The press is essentially liberal. They’re largely pro-Democrat.

TODD: No, no, no, no, don’t begin that. That’s the laz — look, there’s nothing lazier. There’s nothing lazier than that.

CRENSHAW: It’s. I imply, there’s plenty of, there’s plenty of causes to maintain this alive.

TODD: I perceive — what you’re attempting to appease —

CRENSHAW: And there’s lots of people in my get together that take the bait. I’m not going to take the bait right here —

TODD: I’m not attempting to bait you. I’m attempting to — I’m attempting to determine —

CRENSHAW: What’s the end result you’re on the lookout for?

TODD: Why do you, why do you, why will we sit right here and have a political get together that’s mainly rallying round this weird lie and mythology that the previous president is doing, and also you guys simply need to say, ‘Hey, pay no consideration to this,’ that, that someway we within the press are bringing that up. It’s the previous president.

CRENSHAW: Nicely, I already, I already debunked the notion, I already debunked the notion that there is, that there’s no area within the get together for that. Keep in mind, Liz gained that first election —

CHUCK TODD: She’s not there now.

CRENSHAW: She gained that first management vote, OK? And I advised you why. I helped you perceive why. And what I’m attempting that will help you perceive is these usually are not the telephone calls I get about this, about who’s the chief of the get together, what’s occurring with Trump? My Republican supporters don’t ask me about Trump, they don’t ask me about what he stated, they’re not riled up about it. You understand what they’re asking about? What are we doing about over 1 / 4 million unlawful crossings on our border within the final two months? That’s what they’re asking about. How is that sustainable? What about my inflation? What about my financial savings that are actually much less beneficial due to rising inflation as a result of we’re spending cash that we don’t have.

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “There’s nothing lazier than a liberal journalist, within the midst of pursuing a liberal narrative, denying the simple actuality that the press and journalists are largely liberal. If Todd doesn’t need his visitor to name out his biased agenda, then he shouldn’t preserve asking a variation of the identical query again and again as a result of the visitor gained’t accede to his left-wing speaking factors.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ New on Could 10: Liberal Media Scream: Six extra years of ‘Stacey Abrams for president’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the most recent and gushiest media profile of politician and creator (and marvel girl?) Stacey Abrams, who misplaced in her final election however who journalists consider might be president quickly.

CBS Sunday Morning larded on the compliments and promoted her presidential ambitions.

In a phase tied to plugging a brand new novel by Abrams, Erin Moriarty stated, “Your important character is all the time a lady of shade who’s sensible and gutsy and funky beneath stress. In brief, Stacey Abrams.”

After hailing her efforts to counter Republican voter integrity guidelines, Moriarty celebrated how “guaranteeing that proper to vote could sometime assist Abrams obtain her biggest dream: working for president.”

From the Sunday version of the present:

JANE PAULEY: We’re in dialog this morning with Stacey Abrams, the Georgia politician who was a power in final 12 months’s presidential election. However she’s a lady of many different skills, as she’ll inform Erin Moriarty …

MORIARTY: Stacey Abrams has all the time dreamed massive and achieved a lot, however there’s additionally one other facet to the political activist from Georgia.

ABRAMS: I feel folks might be shocked.

MORIARTY: Developing on Sunday Morning, a dialog with a lady of many skills and identities.

MORIARTY: Your important character is all the time a lady of shade who’s sensible and gutsy and funky beneath stress. In brief, Stacey Abrams.

ABRAMS: Nicely, I attempt to emulate my characters, and I attempt to have my characters mirror who I’m.

MORIARTY: Making certain that proper to vote could sometime assist Abrams obtain her biggest dream: working for president.

ABRAMS: Do I maintain it as an ambition? Completely. And much more importantly, when somebody asks me if that’s my ambition, I’ve a accountability to say sure for each younger girl, each individual of shade, each younger individual of shade who sees me and decides what they’re able to primarily based on what I feel I’m able to. Once more, it’s about you can not have these stuff you refuse to dream of.

MORIARTY: With Georgia, Florida, and most not too long ago Texas, passing legal guidelines that restrict voting, Abrams is increasing Honest Struggle’s efforts across the nation. She has a digital e-book tour plan for her new novel and, after all, extra books to jot down, which leaves little time for anything. How do you’ve got any time for a private life?

ABRAMS: Nicely, let’s be clear. So Honest Struggle, there’s additionally the Southern Financial Development Challenge, there’s Honest Depend, there’s writing —

MORIARTY: You’re making my level for me. You’re making my level!

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “It should be good to be a liberal Democrat, really easy to get a pleasant profile from a significant media outlet selling your political ambitions. Moriarty is clearly a private admirer as she poured on the effusive reward, heralding Abrams for the way she has ‘achieved a lot,’ citing her ‘many skills,’ and touting her as ‘sensible and gutsy.’ CBS by no means needed to establish her as a liberal or a Democrat. With that sort of pleasure about her from a journalist, viewers knew she couldn’t be anything.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ Could 3: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC declares black Sen. Tim Scott a race traitor

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream featured a racist assault by a black MSNBC host on South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, additionally black, after he rebutted President Joe Biden’s joint session speech to declaring that America is just not racist.

Main the cable community’s assault was host Tiffany Cross, who denigrated Scott for having the gall to dispute the liberal line that America is racist.

She rolled out each racist phrase she may. Cross known as Scott “a stone idiot,” “slow-witted,” “a token,” and known as his factors “asinine,” all earlier than the very low blow that Harriet Tubman would have left Scott “behind.”

Cross, nonetheless, didn’t have an issue when Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris agreed america is “not a racist nation.”

From Saturday’s The Cross Connection on MSNBC:

Tiffany Cross: “This week, the only black Republican within the Senate sounded a stone idiot when he stated this.”

Scott, within the Republican response to Biden’s tackle to a joint session of Congress: “Hear me clearly, America is just not a racist nation.”

Cross: “OK. Let’s be clear. Tim Scott doesn’t characterize any constituency aside from the small variety of sleepy, slow-witted victims of Stockholm syndrome who get elevated to prominence for repeating a false narrative about this nation that makes conservative white folks really feel comfy as a result of while you communicate an uncomfortable reality, like Nikole Hannah-Jones, the get together that Scott claims is just not racist will get massive mad and tries to silence you. Simply this week, Senate Minority Chief Mitch McConnell requested Schooling Secretary Miguel Cardona to scrap educating the 1619 Challenge in faculties as a result of it will ‘reorient the view of American historical past.’ Fortunate for McConnell, he has his personal faucet dancer to try to reorient the view of America for him.”

“There have been so many contradictions within the senator’s speech that it was clear not even Scott believed the phrases he was talking. I may go into element refuting every of his asinine factors, however he did that for me, and furthermore, a lesson I’ve realized, don’t argue with folks Harriet Tubman would have left behind. And certain, Tim Scott has spoken out about his encounters with legislation enforcement, and he co-sponsored the anti-lynching invoice within the Senate, however there are two sides to each token. So thirsty for white approval, this dude really stood on the nationwide stage to defend the voter suppression legislation in Georgia though, as of final month, 361 payments had been being launched in 47 states to maintain individuals who seem like him out of the poll field.

“The power to disgrace the ancestors and appease the oppressors multi function speech, that’s excessive, although not fairly just like the home violent extremism that the Division of Homeland Safety is investigating inside its personal ranks, thoughts you. However please, senator, say extra about how un-racist the nation is when you trot out that drained line about going from cotton to Congress to clown. Maybe this was merely Sen. Scott’s audition to be Sam Jackson’s understudy within the movie Django as a result of, as a descendant of the enslaved and rattling close to a every day survivor of institutional racism, I can guarantee you the query, ‘is America a racist nation?’, is one which has been requested and answered many occasions over.

“But we nonetheless love America. Not for what it was, however for what it might be. On this one, you’re not solely on the improper facet of the aisle, Sen. Scott, however you’re embarrassingly on the improper facet of historical past, as effectively.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “The 5 scream scale is probably not enough for this one. What a disgusting, hate-filled commentary full of non-public invective, excoriating a U.S. senator as some type of race traitor for daring to deviate from the left-wing line on how America is a racist nation and anybody who’s black should not stray from particular insurance policies advocated by the Democratic get together. Cross reveals how scared liberals are of opposite views, pouncing to silence any divergence from the left’s race orthodoxy earlier than it could possibly get any consideration.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ April 26: Liberal Media Scream: DeSantis should be prime canine the best way media bark at him

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream reveals the most recent proof that the media view rising Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis as an enormous risk.

The identical group that likes to stay “Hate Has No Residence Right here” posters of their entrance yard has pulled out each nasty title and reference they’ll to belittle his enhancements within the state, which continues to see hoards transferring there from the north.

The newest: He’s the reincarnation of former Alabama segregationist Gov. George Wallace.

On MSNBC late final week, anchor Pleasure Reid went on a rant attempting to discredit DeSantis as a Wallace-inspired racist for signing a invoice to carry rioters accountable for damages and hurt to others. “It feels so George Wallace that I’m shocked that George Wallace didn’t really consider it again when he was governor of Alabama,” she stated.

After a visitor from Black Lives Matter declared, “That is straight out of the Jim Crow textbook,” and that “white supremacy is scared to loss of life of us,” Reid stated, “DeSantis seems to essentially need to reenact your entire George Wallace historical past. I suppose he desires to be the modern-day George Wallace, as a result of he’s enacting a slew of legal guidelines that basically attempt to make it unlawful to protest within the state of Florida.”

One thing they didn’t spotlight: Wallace was a Democrat who pursued segregationist insurance policies, as others in his get together had. He was in style sufficient that within the 1972 Democratic presidential primaries, he misplaced to George McGovern by simply 2 factors within the in style vote. He gained the Maryland and Michigan primaries, amongst others, regardless of being shot in an assassination try.

From the Thursday, April 22 The ReidOut on MSNBC:

JOY REID: You understand, Brittany, this feels prefer it’s directed at y’all. That is directed at Black Lives Matter. It feels so George Wallace that I’m shocked that George Wallace didn’t really consider it again when he was governor of Alabama.

BRITTANY PACKNETT CUNNINGHAM, BLM ACTIVIST: Oh, that is straight out of the Jim Crow textbook, and let’s contextualize Jim Crow, we could? When black folks received extra free, there have been new legal guidelines created to make us much less free. That is precisely what is going on proper now. What this really reveals me, Pleasure, is that white supremacy is scared to loss of life of us, and it completely must be. That is what you do while you can’t win truthful and sq.. You suppress votes, and also you suppress voice. So, we have now to concentrate right here, as a result of the GOP performs the lengthy sport, and so they play the expansive sport. They plan far prematurely. They gerrymander states in order that they’ll management statehouses, after which, they use all of that energy to take care of their energy and suppress us from a number of angles. So, then they make it unlawful to interact within the two most democratic practices you bought on this nation, and so they be sure to focus on black people once they do it. That method, amongst different issues, you may leverage the police that you simply’ve militarized to guard your methods and to proceed to terrorize us. So, it’s our job to maintain them on the ropes, as a result of that is what desperation appears like, and I would like them to remain determined. They know the way highly effective we’re. That’s why we’re seeing this.

REID: You understand, Rep. [Anna] Eskamani, the racist Miami sheriff who coined the time period ‘When the looting begins, the taking pictures begins’ was from South Florida. Donald Trump then turns round and quotes him. Ron DeSantis seems to essentially need to reenact your entire George Wallace historical past. I suppose he desires to be the modern-day George Wallace, as a result of he’s enacting a slew of legal guidelines that basically attempt to make it unlawful to protest within the state of Florida, unlawful to the touch their valuable Accomplice statues from the shedding facet of the Civil Battle, proper? However then we can also’t vote. That is Jim Crow in your state. What can Democrats do about it?

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Reid way back misplaced any pretense of being a journalist and is now only a left-wing political activist devoted to smearing and discrediting conservative politicians, particularly rising leaders like DeSantis who dare achieve traction on the Proper by going towards the woke far-left political narrative. She’s returned to her political roots. She labored for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential marketing campaign. Now, she’s engaged on behalf of your entire Democratic Get together to abet its most radical components.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams

 

■ April 19: No Liberal Media Scream this week

 

■ April 12: Liberal Media Scream: Smug shrugs from 60 Minutes on DeSantis hit job

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream turns to the sloppy 60 Minutes report final week on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and the TV information journal’s smug refusal to confess its reporting and enhancing failures in a narrative a Washington Put up media critic called “a plume of innuendo.”

Beneath hearth for every week for suggesting the governor was in a “pay to play” scandal it by no means proved, 60 Minutes as a substitute supplied an enormous “no matter” in response to critics.

At concern was a narrative two Sundays again by correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi, who instructed DeSantis partnered with Florida’s Publix supermarkets to present COVID-19 photographs after dishing contributions to him.

He denied the costs, however a lot of his clarification was edited out of the story, and media critics stated that the reporter made her case poorly. DeSantis known as the story a “massive lie.”

Final night time, on the finish of the present, when letters are typically learn, Alfonsi didn’t pull again her story and as a substitute learn excerpts from three letters, beginning with how “some viewers, together with a retired newsman, applauded the story.”

She moved on to a lady who denounced CBS’s “shameful biased reporting,” then ended with a cutesy problem from a person who wrote, “I’ll solely watch” the present “yet one more time. Simply to see if you happen to broadcast this message.”

From the conclusion of the April 11 60 Minutes:

Sharyn Alfonsi: “Within the mail this week, feedback on our story about disparities within the distribution of COVID-19 vaccine in Palm Seaside County, Florida. Viewers targeted on an trade with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis at a press convention. Some viewers, together with a retired newsman, applauded the story.”

Studying a letter from Nick Boryack of Vero Seaside, Florida: “Ron DeSantis will proceed to disclaim, refute, name your reporting a witch hunt. I can solely hope that you simply proceed to analyze and expose the reality.”

Alfonsi: “However many extra feedback condemned our enhancing and reporting.”

Studying a letter from Amy Ernest of Houston, Texas: “Shameful biased reporting – that’s what you’re responsible of. You’re now not journalists, however lobbyists and advocates.”

Alfonsi: “Then there was this:”

Alfonsi studying a letter from David Plewes of Lighthouse Level, Florida: “I’ve watched 60 Minutes for many years. After your biased piece on Governor DeSantis, I’ll solely watch it yet one more time. Simply to see if you happen to broadcast this message.”

Alfonsi: “I’m Sharyn Alfonsi. We’ll be again subsequent week with one other version of 60 Minutes.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “A really outstanding instance of how the information media refuse to carry themselves accountable which offers extra recent proof for why anybody proper of middle has no motive to ever belief journalists to be truthful to a conservative elected official. After every week wherein Democrats, and even liberal media observers, condemned 60 Minutes for a distorted story, the present did not admit its misdeeds or retract the story. As a substitute, they dug in, downgrading accountability to studying a couple of random viewer feedback.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ April 5: Liberal Media Scream: PBS’s Yamiche Alcindor connects Georgia voting to George Floyd trial

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream reveals the lockstep reactionaryism to Georgia’s new election reform legislation that really expands some voting protections — however is outwardly too troublesome for critics to learn.

The checklist of these blasting it as racist is lengthy, however we function PBS’s Yamiche Alcindor as a result of she took it one other step and tied it to the homicide trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who has been charged within the loss of life of George Floyd.

“Watching this [Chauvin] trial and watching what’s occurring in Georgia, they completely join,” she stated throughout Meet the Press on Sunday.

The Georgia legislation has divided partisans, particularly company America’s response, together with MLB’s resolution final week to maneuver the annual All-Star Sport out of Atlanta in protest. On the similar time, some information shops have began to check the brand new legislation extra and located much less to complain about whereas noting that a number of different states have a lot stricter election guidelines.

From the present:

Yamiche Alcindor: “Nicely, the Chauvin trial, and that homicide trial within the loss of life of George Floyd, is related to voting rights as a result of, on the finish of the day, it’s about how African Individuals and whether or not African Individuals are allowed to outlive and thrive in America and are in a position to have entry to the ideas that America holds up as close to and pricey. And that, after all, is democracy. Nevertheless it’s additionally your capacity to pursue happiness and to not have an officer kneel in your neck for 9 minutes and 29 seconds. Watching this trial and watching what’s occurring in Georgia, they completely join.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Alcindor displayed the all too typical angle of journalists who don’t see something improper with presuming advocates of constructing voting safer aren’t any totally different than enforcers of ‘Jim Crow’ or, as she charged, are against letting African Individuals ‘survive’ in America. Linking Georgia, which really expanded voting entry in a number of methods, to a homicide trial is an outrage and reveals Alcindor is extra a far-left political advocate, who stirs up racial animosities to advance a trigger, than any sort of dispassionate journalist.”

Ranking: FIVE out of FIVE screams.

 

■ March 29: Liberal Media Scream: ‘Unhappy however true,’ Pleasure Reid agrees GOP would make Jesus endure

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream has an Easter and election angle, however it’s not very uplifting.

It contains a well-known Georgetown College professor condemning GOP election reform efforts in states equivalent to Georgia and suggesting that the get together is so racist and imply it will “go a legislation to maintain Jesus from getting a cup of water whereas he is dying on the cross.”

And, after all, it led to Pleasure Reid, host of her present The ReidOut, agreeing with Professor Michael Eric Dyson.

The feedback got here whereas the nation is in a heated debate over election reform, with the GOP heading to tightening poll entry and Democrats transferring to open it as much as a nationwide mail-in system.

Reid’s present targeted on condemning the GOP, and Dyson stated Republican efforts like these in Georgia are going additional than previous segregationist Jim Crow legal guidelines. “The actual faith, the actual politics in America is whiteness and whiteness unhinged,” he stated.

Dyson on the Friday version of The ReidOut:

“I imply, President Biden is correct. That is Jim Crow, that is Jane Crow …The actual faith, the actual politics in America, is whiteness and whiteness unhinged … I feel he’s considering it severely when he sees the results. What he must do is fill these busters with some concern of the federal government. These are the sort of people that would go a legislation to maintain Jesus from getting a cup of water whereas he is dying on the cross.”

Reid agreed: “Unhappy however true.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “A cute-sounding quip however with a tough edge simply earlier than Palm Sunday as MSNBC determined to showcase Dyson, a person who all the time sees racial animus motivating conservatives. It’s all a part of the far-left/information media joint effort to smear as racist anybody enthusiastic about protecting the voting system trustworthy, thus discrediting their issues with out having to handle their substance.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ March 22: Liberal Media Scream: Seth Meyers rants towards rural whites, Structure

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream steps exterior the standard lane of indignant information media figures to NBC’s Late Night time present hosted by Seth Meyers and his 15-minute rant for H.R. 1, the “For the Folks Act” election legislation, and towards the filibuster.

His was a sweeping condemnation of Republicans, rural Individuals, whites, and the Founding Fathers.

He opened Thursday by charging that the electoral system is “closely tilted towards a minority of voters which can be predominately white and rural, thanks largely to anti-majoritarian establishments just like the Electoral School and the Senate.” He cited new Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock’s “impassioned speech in favor of sweeping voting reforms” and accused Republicans of pushing Jim Crow-style election adjustments.

“Republicans tried to steal the final election by way of the courts. That didn’t work, so now they’re attempting to steal the subsequent election by way of voter suppression. Nuking or altering the filibuster to cease them is an ethical necessity,” he urged in his “Nearer Look” phase:

A few of the lowlights:

“Our democracy as at the moment constituted is solely not a degree taking part in discipline. In actual fact, it’s arguably by no means been a degree taking part in discipline, it’s closely tilted towards a minority of voters which can be predominately white and rural, thanks largely to anti-majoritarian establishments just like the Electoral School and the Senate. Simply take into account that proper now the Senate is evenly cut up 50-50 and but the 50 Senate Democrats characterize practically 42 million extra Individuals than the 50 Senate Republicans. For instance, Wyoming with a inhabitants of about 580,000 folks, has two senators. And New York additionally has two senators, though there are 580,000 folks simply on my co-op board. …

“I imply, simply take into account the scope of how closely tilted our democratic establishments are towards Republicans. They’ve solely gained the favored vote as soon as within the final 32 years, but, they’ve appointed a majority of Supreme Courtroom justices, they’ve misplaced the favored vote by practically 3 million. In 2016, misplaced the Home by the most important margin since Watergate in 2018, misplaced two Senate seats in traditionally crimson Georgia this 12 months, and but, Mitch McConnell nonetheless mainly will get a veto over what the Senate can or can’t go. The one method the Senate can get something performed proper now’s by way of a course of known as price range reconciliation, which has extra guidelines than a Manhattan parking signal. …

“Warnock delivered an impassioned speech in favor of sweeping voting reforms, and he famous that the GOP assault on voting rights is essentially the most ferocious assault on democracy because the period of Jim Crow.”

[Sen. Raphael Warnock: “We are witnessing right now a massive and unabashed assault on voting rights, unlike anything we’ve ever seen since the Jim Crow era. This is Jim Crow in new clothes.”]

“He’s proper. And the garments aren’t even good. I imply, take a look at this [picture of Trump], it appears like he was thrown bare within the dumpster behind a Palm Seaside pro-shop, and given 5 minutes to choose an outfit. It’s a superb Halloween costume if you wish to go as a misplaced grandpa at Disney World. Warnock was on the ground particularly to name for Senate passage of H.R. 1, a sweeping package deal of pressing voting reforms handed by the Home which can be desperately wanted to degree what’s at the moment a really lopsided taking part in discipline. H.R. 1 would fight just about each GOP voter suppression tactic by, amongst different issues, mandating nationwide early voting and no-excuse mail voting, instituting computerized and same-day voter registration, implementing public financing of elections, and banning congressional gerrymandering, amongst different issues. It’s additionally extremely in style in polls, even among the many majority of Republican voters. So, naturally, Republican politicians are shedding their minds over it. …

“Republicans tried to steal the final election by way of the courts. That didn’t work, so now they’re attempting to steal the subsequent election by way of voter suppression. Nuking or altering the filibuster to cease them is an ethical necessity. We badly want sweeping reforms to make our democracy a degree taking part in discipline.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Meyers’s argument must be with the founders, not present-day Republicans. He’s upset that our constitutional system, with two senators from each state, is inhibiting the enactment of left-wing insurance policies, as if the Senate make-up is one thing new. He’s upset by Wyoming however ignores how the subsequent least-populous state, Vermont, has a socialist and a left-wing Democrat for senators. H.R. 1 must be often known as the ‘Allow Unlawful Voting Act,’ because it’s a grab-bag of left-wing insurance policies geared toward making it simple for Democrats to get votes from these not certified to vote. The actual fact Meyers is so enthusiastic about it demonstrates he’s a left-wing Democratic activist first, a comic a distant second.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ March 15: Liberal Media Scream: Meet the Press blames Trump for Cuomo refusing to give up

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options the most recent model of “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” this time on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Discussing embattled New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s refusal to step down over a few scandals, the tag crew of host Chuck Todd and visitor John Heilemann blamed Trump, suggesting that he set the “precedent” for refusing to give up when pressed by critics.

“He’s following what’s seen now because the Trump precedent,” stated Heilemann of Cuomo.

Todd turned on conservatives, calling them “enthusiastic about Cuomo’s downfall” when it’s been Democrats on the highest ranges calling the liberal governor to give up over COVID-19 and intercourse scandals.

From the roundtable on Sunday’s Meet the Press:

John Heilemann: “I feel, , that the opposite factor that’s true is Cuomo is completely dug in. I feel the chance of Cuomo resigning is near zero. And I feel, , he’s following proper now — uncomfortably for lots of Democrats — he’s following what’s seen now because the Trump precedent. You understand, if you’re decided sufficient, you’re shameless sufficient, you may maintain on.

“And so the query then simply turns into: Does he really get impeached, does he really get thrown out? And I feel that’s going to be — a big query round that’s going to be what extra proof comes out over the approaching — perhaps sufficient now, however there’s going to be a big query of what else unfolds over the subsequent couple weeks.”

Chuck Todd: “It does really feel like he’s forcing that. I’m glad you introduced up Trump there a minute, John. Lanhee [Chen], I would like you to reply on one thing Tim Miller wrote within the Bulwark. He stated, ‘Dunking on Cuomo’s demise requires admitting that the opposite get together has requirements and lays naked, as soon as once more, the cravenness of the excuse-making for Trump that stored the lights on for the previous 5 years.’ There’s plenty of conservative media, acolytes, and propagandists which can be very enthusiastic about Cuomo’s downfall, however they appear to not be very self-reflective.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Trump Derangement Syndrome lives on, particularly with these within the media nonetheless upset Trump’s private foibles didn’t undermine assist amongst his followers. Heilemann and Todd can’t recover from their contempt for Trump and so nonetheless need to scold his supporters for hypocrisy with out seeing any in themselves in cueing up a ‘Trump precedent’ to rationalize misbehavior by a liberal Democrat.”

Scream ranking: THREE out of FIVE Screams.

 

■ March 8: Liberal Media Scream: CNN anchor says Republicans don’t really feel ‘ache’ of individuals

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream takes a take a look at the in a single day bias on CNN, and it’s a doozy.

In keeping with CNN in a single day anchor Rosemary Church, Republicans are callous and heartless and might’t really feel the ache of these they characterize. It reminded us of once they used to name CNN the “Clinton Information Community” for its supportive protection of the president who famously stated in his 1992 marketing campaign, “I really feel your ache.”

The feedback got here after Senate Republicans balked at approving the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending invoice that the GOP stated spends little or no on quick coronavirus points.

Interviewing Ron Brownstein of the Atlantic, Church noticed urgency in advancing the Biden agenda.

The primary two inquiries to Brownstein from the Atlanta-based anchor for CNN Worldwide within the 3 a.m. hour of CNN Newsroom Stay simulcast on the home facet:

“So President Biden’s COVID reduction package deal cleared the Senate with none Republican assist Saturday. Now it’s heading again to the Home for a vote Tuesday. How seemingly is it that it’ll go this week? And the way crucial is it that this will get performed and performed quick?”

“How does all of this search for Republicans who didn’t get on board with serving to folks? They don’t really feel a lot of the ache that different Individuals are feeling throughout this pandemic, to allow them to’t start to grasp what individuals are going by way of. How a lot of a barrier is that disconnect for a celebration already fighting its personal id?”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Church completely encapsulates the presumptions of so many journalists who assume it’s past dispute that anybody who opposes an enormous new spending invoice is an out-of-touch and uncaring lout, that anybody who disagrees with their outlook has crass motives unfit of consideration. It’s the sort of embedded bias which infuriates everybody proper of middle, however can’t be acknowledged by journalists like Church who’re blind to their very own bias.”

Scream ranking: FOUR out of FIVE Screams.

 

■ March 1: Liberal Media Scream: MSNBC’s Ali Velshi says racism defines America

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options MSNBC host Ali Velshi condemning America as racist eternally.

“Racism is one thing that has outlined america since its very founding,” stated the Kenyan-born former Canadian journalist on his present Velshi.

His feedback got here in introducing creator Heather McGhee on to speak about her e-book on racism. In his intro, he stated American whites are so racist that they’ll damage their very own financial future to cease blacks.

McGhee, creator of The Sum of Us: What Racism Prices Everybody and How We Can Prosper Collectively, agreed and supplied Obamacare for instance of whites being racially pushed to oppose a useful program as a result of it was proposed by a black president.

From Saturday morning’s Velshi on MSNBC:

Ali Velshi: “Racism is one thing that has outlined america since its very founding. In actual fact, it infects practically all aspects of American life, like healthcare, about which we simply heard. Nevertheless it additionally impacts our politics and our economics. The false perception that progress and prosperity for folks of shade comes on the expense of white folks has helped prop up racist methods for generations. This zero-sum idea is what creator Heather McGhee tackles in her new e-book, ‘The Sum of Us: What Racism Prices Everybody and How We Can Prosper Collectively.’ In it, she examines the self-destructive cut price of white supremacy and the way a lot we’ve misplaced economically as a rustic attributable to racism by way of a greenback quantity.

“One of many issues that appeals to me about your e-book is the dialogue that you’ve got about how folks, typically white folks or individuals who have energy and privilege in society, typically make selections that aren’t of their financial pursuits or work towards their very own prosperity as a result of they really feel like giving different folks, on this case, black folks, sure rights and privileges will take away a few of their very own.”

Heather McGhee: “That’s precisely proper. I imply, to remain on the problem of healthcare, which you’ve got lined so effectively, Ali, , white individuals are really the most important group of the uninsured, and but, ever because the Reasonably priced Care Act was signed by our first black president, nearly all of white folks have disapproved of the gorgeous modest thought that’s Obamacare, and there’s an enormous correlation between racial resentment towards black folks and the southern, normally, states and likewise Maine, which is the whitest state within the nation, refusal to develop Medicaid beneath Obamacare. So it’s this concept that authorities is on the facet of individuals of shade, and that’s the reason there’s such a fierce anti-government skepticism and suspicion among the many majority of white voters — nearly all of white voters who’ve voted for the Republican Get together for president, I’ll remind you, ever since Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “As folks obsessed by race, Velshi and McGhee lack self-awareness in attributing racism to these with a unique standpoint. It’s not possible to have a rational coverage dialogue when so many liberals within the media hurl racism accusations in any respect these of 1 race who don’t purchase into the liberal agenda, as if they can’t have a logical motive for opposing the coverage aside from their presumed racism. It’s very damaging politics.”

Ranking: FOUR out of FIVE screams.

 

■ February 22: Liberal Media Scream: Liberals rush to dump on Rush Limbaugh

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream takes observe of the loss of life of conservative discuss radio icon Rush Limbaugh, who influenced many and even pushed some, notably former Vice President Mike Pence, to leap into politics.

Associates and allies had been effusive of their reward.

So too was the hate from his foes, too many to checklist right here. However for instance, we function former New York Instances media reporter Invoice Carter who disparaged Florida’s plans to honor the long-time resident.

Showing on CNN’s Dependable Sources, Carter, now a “media analyst” for CNN, contended Limbaugh didn’t deserve the eye given him by Gov. Ron DeSantis, who plans to decrease the state flag.

After host Brian Stelter requested him in regards to the plan by DeSantis, Carter stated:

“Nicely, it’s sort of surprising as a result of, I imply, to start with, the governor of Florida is simply taking part in for conservative consideration in doing that. However the justification is de facto questionable.

“I imply, look, Limbaugh had an enormous following, and it was very fashionable amongst, , a bunch of right-wing listeners. However he wasn’t a heroic determine. I imply, he had plenty of incidents that had been extraordinarily questionable, and his views had been fairly ugly, and so they damage lots of people. They damage some folks personally.

“And I feel – , there have been an terrible lot of people who find themselves justifiably saying why are you celebrating a man who attacked Barack Obama on race, who sang ‘Barack the Magic Negro’ and every kind of extraordinarily outrageous issues that, frankly, the conservatives beloved. They beloved him for that. And he established the model. He did. That was a model. However to make it a heroic factor or one thing that must be celebrated like, , a warfare hero, I discover that fairly questionable.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Fairly commonplace liberal ‘standard knowledge’ right here from Carter, and that’s the frustration. You’d hope a reporter with a profession masking the media may rise above simply passing alongside liberal bromides and, at the very least within the days after his passing, would provide one thing optimistic a couple of man who earned the loyalty of tens of millions for greater than thirty years and impressed generations of Individuals about the advantages of conservative coverage options.”

Ranking: 3 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

■ February 15: Liberal Media Scream: CNN’s Don Lemon goes there and blames ‘horrible Reagan’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options ranting CNN host Don Lemon tying every thing he doesn’t wish to one of the in style presidents in United States historical past: Ronald Reagan.

“Reagan was horrible,” stated Lemon, who instructed that the Republican’s two-term presidency paved the best way for the Capitol riots.

Shouting over fellow CNN host Chris Cuomo, Lemon stated Republicans are additionally dangerous for respecting Reagan.

“They maintain him as much as a gold commonplace. Whenever you take a look at what he really achieved, he didn’t,” he stated.

From the Thursday, Feb. 11 CNN Tonight, in the course of the handoff from Chris Cuomo’s 9 p.m. present to Lemon’s 10 p.m. present:

CHRIS CUOMO: Reagan and Bush Republicans had been nothing like these guys.

DON LEMON: I don’t learn about that.

CUOMO: Simply the problem of immigration. Take a look at how Reagan and George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush talked about immigration.

LEMON: Reagan was the primary presidential election that I voted in. And pay attention, … I’m simply saying that individuals maintain him as much as be — Reagan was not excellent. Reagan was horrible when it got here to—

CUOMO: Good? He gave us one of many largest deficits we’ve ever seen, and he completely fed the divide.

LEMON: That is what I imply. They all the time maintain him up as a gold commonplace. However while you take a look at what he really achieved, he didn’t. He was horrible when it got here to racial points. He was horrible when it got here to the AIDS disaster. He was horrible when it got here to uniting the nation. He didn’t unite the nation — he was a divider. And they also maintain him up as a gold commonplace. … I simply suppose it’s levels, however I feel the Republican Get together has been transferring on this course eternally.

Once more, they’re the get together of every thing that they’re attempting to fake that they’re not. Now saying, “The folks within the Capitol, that’s not us.” Sure, it’s you! “The those that had been in Charlottesville, that’s not us.” Sure, it’s you! These individuals are not marching for Democrats. And this entire bizarre factor that they preserve saying, “What in regards to the riots and the demonstration that occurred this summer season?” That’s apples and oranges. To begin with, the demonstrations, the protests had been for one thing that’s actual. It was for inequality. It was for police brutality. It was for all these issues. It was individuals who had been rising up for his or her rights. What occurred on the Capitol was constructed on a lie.

Media Analysis Heart Vice President for Analysis and Publications Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Such disdain for the late former president, who’s a hero to conservatives and an inspiration to many oppressed by communism around the globe, reveals the baselessness of the widespread media line that they needed to be hostile to Donald Trump as a result of he posed a brand new sort of harmful and racist risk to democracy and all that’s good about america. If Lemon had a CNN present within the Eighties he would have been simply as hostile to Reagan, calling him a racist night time after night time, as he was and is to Trump. Conservative presidents come and go, however the media contempt for them by no means wavers.”

Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

■ February 8: Liberal Media Scream: Reporter decries ‘ex-boyfriend…abuse’ from Group Trump

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream had plenty of decisions from reporters by no means happier than to have a brand new administration that thinks like they do to report on.

However just one expressed the reduction she felt in attending to cowl the Democratic Biden administration after the “dangerous ex-boyfriend” abuse she felt coping with Group Trump.

On CNN on Sunday, Yahoo Information White Home correspondent Brittany Shepherd got here down exhausting on former Trump press secretary Kayleigh McEnany. She in contrast McEnany’s White Home briefings to “having a extremely dangerous ex-boyfriend. We had been getting basically abused by Kayleigh for thus lengthy.”

And worse, she charged that McEnany incited folks to “go to lethal ends for some folks with loss of life threats.”

However now, with spokeswoman Jen Psaki, “It’s very refreshing.”

Shepherd on CNN’s Dependable Sources:

“It’s been actually refreshing to have briefings day by day and to even know who the senior officers speaking to Biden are. We weren’t getting that in any of the Trump years, particularly in these waning days of the McEnany briefings.

“And it’s refreshing, I do sort of put it in the direction of like having a extremely dangerous ex-boyfriend. We had been getting basically abused by Kayleigh for thus lengthy, or at the very least she was calling us faux information and inciting her followers and followers of the president to not solely harass us on-line however clearly go to lethal ends for some folks with loss of life threats.

“Now, we have now Jen and your entire Biden crew. It’s very refreshing. Nevertheless it’s vital to keep in mind that the bar has actually been left on the ground, and simply with the ability to present up and clear it isn’t sufficient.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Shepherd exemplifies the hostility the White Home press corps had towards Kayleigh McEnany and all issues Trump, mixed with their keen embrace of the brand new administration, fast to hail Biden’s press crew as ‘very refreshing.’ It’s as if Shepherd simply received a job switch from an workplace full of individuals she finds disreputable to a brand new workplace full of people that encourage her.”

Ranking: 3 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

■ February 1: Liberal Media Scream: New excessive in CNN bias, blames GOP for ‘divided America’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream contains a new excessive within the anti-GOP bias proven by CNN, this time blaming the political divide on the Tea Get together, Sarah Palin, Roger Ailes, Fox Information, former Home Speaker Newt Gingrich, and, after all, former President Donald Trump.

Over one hour final night time, Fareed Zakaria pointed an enormous finger on the GOP in his particular, The Divided States of America: What Is Tearing Us Aside? Again and again, the reply was boiled right down to Republicans. And if that wasn’t sufficient, Republicans had been typically described as racists.

Zakaria stated, “When students hung out with Tea Get together activists, they discovered that behind the discuss of taxes and massive authorities had been folks principally motivated by fears about race and immigration.”

He moved on to how Ailes “turned his channel right into a right-wing bull horn, blurring information and opinion like by no means earlier than.”

He added, “Trump had a task mannequin for his exploitation of the category divide: Sarah Palin, who did it first.”

His remaining goal was Gingrich: “Earlier than there was a Donald Trump, there was a Republican pioneer who paved the best way for the Trump model of damaging politics. … His legacy has been each darkish and far-reaching — a everlasting state of warfare between the events.”

Some excerpts from CNN’s The Divided States of America: What’s Tearing Us Aside? which aired Sunday night time, Jan. 31:

FAREED ZAKARIA: When students hung out with Tea Get together activists, they discovered behind the discuss of taxes and massive authorities had been folks principally motivated by fears about race and immigration.

JON MEACHAM: The individuals who have been most radicalized by the Trump years believed that range was an thought, not a vivid actuality.

ZAKARIA: In 1950, the 12 months our political events had been stated to be too related, the nation was about 90% white. Now in 2021, as we face an existential disaster of political division, America is about 59% white.

MEACHAM: We live in essentially the most vivid manifestation of the politics of concern in our historical past. That’s the place we are actually.

ZAKARIA: Ailes turned the go-to right-wing media strategist of the Eighties, notorious for his vicious assaults.

TV AD NARRATOR: As Gov. Michael Dukakis gave weekend furloughs to first-degree murderers.

ZAKARIA: In 1996, Ailes discovered his future when billionaire Rupert Murdoch got here calling. The correct wing’s favourite hatchet man was now creating a brand new information community. The previous, mainstream media cartel had splintered.

BRIT HUME, IN OLD FNC PROMO: Today, folks suppose TV information is about as unbiased because the commercials.

ZAKARIA: On cable, each channel wanted to seek out its personal slice of the viewers. Ailes turned his channel right into a right-wing bull horn, blurring information and opinion like by no means earlier than. Huge scores and earnings quickly adopted.

ZAKARIA: Donald Trump had a task mannequin for his exploitation of the category divide: Sarah Palin, who did it first. When America’s hockey mother turned John McCain’s working mate in 2008 —

SARAH PALIN, FORMER REPUBLICAN ALASKA GOVERNOR: They are saying the distinction between a hockey mother and a pit bull: lipstick.

ZAKARIA: She leaned closely on id politics, on American values and tradition, to rile up her base.

PALIN: I’m not a member of the everlasting political institution.

ZAKARIA: Her model of America, speaking about the actual America, saying, ‘I’m one in all you,’ was the precursor of Trump’s warfare on elites.

GEORGE PACKER: Sarah Palin, who I consider as John the Baptist to Trump, she was the one who got here first.

DONALD TRUMP: Governor Sarah Palin.

ZAKARIA: However earlier than there was a Donald Trump, there was a Republican pioneer who paved the best way for the Trump model of damaging politics.

NEWT GINGRICH, FORMER REPUBLICAN HOUSE SPEAKER: I’m a real revolutionary. They’re the real reactionaries. We’re going to change their world.

ZAKARIA: That is the story of Newt Gingrich, the person who wrote the playbook for the fashionable conservative motion. … It was a really totally different time in politics when civility and compromise mattered. Home Republican Chief Bob Michael was broadly often known as Mr. Good Man. Think about that.

VAN JONES: Newt Gingrich is available in with a buzz noticed.

GINGRICH: What we live by way of is a elementary civil wrestle, a civil warfare fought in public speeches reasonably than with armies.

ZAKARIA: The Gingrich philosophy: The one method for Republicans to win again energy was to be nasty — actually nasty.

GINGRICH: For the Democrats to mainly say not solely are we going to rape you however it’s a must to pay for the lodge room is a bit a lot.

ZAKARIA: To deal with Democrats not as opponents however the enemy. … His legacy has been each darkish and far-reaching — a everlasting state of warfare between the events.

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Fairly a pretentious feat by CNN and Zakaria in managing in charge all the nation’s ills on the tone of the rhetoric from conservative political figures, as if liberals are innocent for political divisiveness. By selecting in charge just one facet, CNN and Zakaria are exacerbating the very downside they declare to be attempting to diagnose.”

Ranking: 5 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

■ January 25: Liberal Media Scream: Nuremberg trial for Trump?

(Washington Examiner put up)

You’d suppose they might be completely happy to maneuver on, however this week’s Liberal Media Scream options an ABC Information analyst calling for the second impeachment trial within the Senate of former President Donald Trump to be extra of a reality and accountability fee course of.

“To me, the impeachment — we have now to separate the components of the impeachment vote. I imply, different international locations have gone by way of this earlier than, Germany, Japan, South Africa, and the factor earlier than you get to reconciliation and therapeutic, it’s a must to have some ingredient of reality and accountability on this,” stated Matthew Dowd.

What occurred in these international locations? South Africa arrange the Fact and Reconciliation Fee after the tip of apartheid, Japan had the Tokyo Battle Crimes Tribunal after World Battle II, and Germany had the Nuremberg trials.

In calling for a Trump reality tribunal, Dowd instructed that with out one, america might be in for a century of political bother that he in comparison with racism.

Dowd in the course of the roundtable on Sunday’s This Week on ABC:

“Nicely, to me, the impeachment — we have now to separate the components of the impeachment vote. I imply, different international locations have gone by way of this earlier than, Germany, Japan, South Africa, and the factor earlier than you get to reconciliation and therapeutic, it’s a must to have some ingredient of reality and accountability on this.

“And even moreover these international nation examples, we have now an instance in our nation throughout Reconstruction within the aftermath of the Civil Battle once we went by way of — we had been purported to undergo a technique of reality and accountability and altering the character of what went on. And when Abraham Lincoln was killed and Andrew Johnson took over, reconciling — I imply, the thought of forming a factor and demanding reality was stopped. And what did they end in, George? It resulted on this nation of Jim Crow legal guidelines, it resulted on this nation of the KKK, and it resulted on this nation of 100 years extra of a battle for justice and reality and equality in our nation.

“And so, we have now to get to a state of affairs the place, sure, let’s have a dialogue of what was the reality, what did Donald Trump do, what must be his accountability, and the ultimate stage of that’s: What must be his punishment?

“And to me, the one method to do this is to have a dialog within the trial within the Senate the place information and information and information and data is offered in such a method that the American public can see precisely what went on, what was Donald Trump accountable for, what ought to he held accountable to. After which, finally, what ought to his punishment be?

“However we must always not do what occurred in Reconstruction. When Reconstruction was ended and we went by way of this enormous, lengthy, centurylong course of when justice lastly prevailed ultimately. We now have to have an perception into the reality earlier than we get to reconciliation and therapeutic.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “To say something Donald Trump has performed is on par with genocidal regimes, or that he has left the nation in a situation anyplace much like a segregated, race-based two-class system just like the America within the many years after the Civil Battle, is simply ridiculous. The opposite panelists ought to have laughed at him. Dowd wants his personal accountability session to separate actuality from his overwrought historic comparisons.”

Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

■ January 18, 2021: Liberal Media Scream: Name to silence conservatives and kick OANN and Newsmax off air

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN offering a platform for a name to take rivals OANN and Newsmax off the air and to additionally rob conservative influencers of social media shops.

On the heels of Huge Tech kicking the conservative chat website Parler and firearms website AR15.com offline, the previous head of safety for Fb and Yahoo stated taking platforms away from conservatives is the results of the election and protests on the U.S. Capitol.

Alex Stamos stated, we “have to show down the aptitude of those conservative influencers to succeed in these enormous audiences” on Fb and YouTube.

“Then we’re going to have to determine the OANN and Newsmax downside,” urging they be faraway from cable methods. “These firms have freedom of speech, however I’m undecided we’d like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, and such to be bringing them into tens of tens of millions of properties.”

Stamos, on Sunday’s Dependable Sources, the place he appeared with Krebs Stamos Group associate Christopher Krebs, the Trump administration’s former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company:

“First, it’s a must to concentrate on the violent extremists, and people firms must be courageous in that method. And, second, we have now to show down the aptitude of those conservative influencers to succeed in these enormous audiences. There are folks on YouTube, for instance, which have a bigger daytime — bigger viewers than daytime CNN, and they’re extraordinarily radical and pushing extraordinarily radical views.”

“And, so, it’s as much as the Facebooks and YouTubes, specifically, to consider whether or not or not they need to be successfully cable networks for disinformation. After which we’re going to have to determine the OANN and Newsmax downside, , these firms have freedom of speech, however I’m undecided we’d like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, and such to be bringing them into tens of tens of millions of properties. That is, , permitting folks to hunt out info in the event that they actually need to, however not pushing it into their faces, I feel is the place we’re going to must go right here.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “A really stable sign Huge Tech’s agenda goes past what they need to painting as benign efforts to close down these advocating violence. Stamos laid out the subsequent step: Use present issues to justify a wider suppression of conservative voices who’ve allowed area for views these on the Left discover appalling. The reply is extra free speech, not letting a small group of rich Silicon Valley tech leaders abuse their energy to function ‘speech police,’ deciding which views are OK or not with the elite in the meanwhile.”

Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

■ January 11, 2021: Liberal Media Scream: CNN desires conservative media squelched in ‘nationwide emergency’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options CNN’s senior media reporter demanding the focusing on of conservative media shops who ignored their anti-Trump bias in reporting on the president and his administration.

On Sunday’s Dependable Sources, Oliver Darcy demanded conservative information sources be “held accountable,” clearly suggesting that they should be squelched, an enlargement of the so-called “cancel tradition” imposed with glee by shops equivalent to Twitter and Fb on conservatives and even President Trump.

He cited Fox Information and “TV suppliers that beam OAN and Newsmax into properties, or Rush Limbaugh. There are lots of people profiting off of lies and conspiracy theories.”

He insisted, “this informational atmosphere” should be “cleaned up.”

Darcy, on the finish of Sunday’s Dependable Sources:

“The story this week was bringing our informational disaster to the forefront. It’s a nationwide emergency. You’ve got companies and other people which can be profiting off lies and conspiracy theories, whether or not that’s massive tech, whether or not that’s Fox Information, whether or not that’s TV suppliers that beam OAN and Newsmax into properties, or Rush Limbaugh. There are lots of people profiting off of lies and conspiracy theories, and I don’t actually see how issues get higher, how we transfer on as a rustic till this informational atmosphere is cleaned up.”

After host Brian Stelter complained that “Fox Information, the Murdochs, they’re nonetheless enabling these items as a result of they’re obsessing over massive tech bias, that’s what they name it, and attempting to disregard the riot,” Darcy demanded:

“The place are they? They have to be held accountable as effectively. We had been speaking lots about folks like Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz. Rupert Murdoch, Lachlan Murdoch, they have to be held accountable for the lies that they’ve peddled to this nation, not solely prior to now two months in regards to the election both, however prior to now, , a number of years which have actually introduced this to the forefront.”

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Darcy revealed the true agenda the exhausting left inside CNN: Selectively cite the baseless allegations of some on one facet of the political spectrum to justify shutting down all the most important shops which permit conservative views to get an airing, silencing these with which Darcy disagrees, thus permitting the general public to solely hear left wing views. An ideal instance of ‘cancel tradition.’”

Ranking: 4 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

■ January 4, 2021: Liberal Media Scream: Smug Chuck Todd to senator, ‘I’ve Had Sufficient of Listening to This!’

(Washington Examiner put up)

This week’s Liberal Media Scream options NBC’s Chuck Todd, who placed on his most dismissive smirk Sunday to mock Republican Sen. Ron Johnson’s protection of President Trump’s claims of election fraud.

It got here on Todd’s present, Meet the Press, and regardless of speaking over Johnson, a matter-of-fact lawmaker/businessman, the senator stood his floor and advised the host after being badgered, “You’ve got destroyed the credibility of the information media by your bias.”

When Johnson identified, “This fireplace was began while you utterly ignored, for instance, our investigation of Hunter Biden,” Todd jumped in: “Senator. All proper, I’ve had sufficient of listening to this!”

Through the heated, multi-minute trade, Todd turned to ridicule when Johnson mentioned investigating Trump’s allegations of voter fraud. “Why didn’t you maintain hearings in regards to the 9/11 truthers? There’s loads of individuals who thought 9/11 was an inside job.” And: “How in regards to the Moon touchdown? Are you going to carry hearings on that?”

From the Sunday, Jan. 3, Meet the Press:

SEN. RON JOHNSON: Chuck, this fireplace was began again in, , January of 2017. Folks like Mark Zaid in his tweet, ‘The coup has began. First of many steps. Rebel and impeachment to observe finally.’ This was began when the mainstream media stopped, dropped any pretense of being unbiased and truly selected sides throughout this election. This fireplace was began while you utterly ignored, for instance, our investigation of Hunter Biden. You understand, no proof of wrongdoing there. And now we discover out after the election, no, there’s a truthful quantity of proof to the purpose that we have now an actual FBI investigation. So-

CHUCK TODD: Senator. All proper, I’ve had sufficient of listening to this!

JOHNSON: No, pay attention. I’ve had sufficient of this, too. It’s the bias of the media.

TODD: No, senator. It’s, you’ve got spent, you’ve got spent the final two years —

JOHNSON: It’s the bias within the media that has created a state of affairs the place Republicans and conservatives don’t belief the mainstream media. And that’s what, that’s what has destroyed the credibility of the media and our establishments and actually —

TODD: Proper, no, the destruction of the establishments —

JOHNSON: — shaken confidence on this election outcome. So I didn’t begin this … I didn’t, I didn’t gentle this fireplace. This fireplace was lit over 4 years in the past. And we’ve destroyed the credibility, you’ve got destroyed the credibility of the information media by your bias. And naturally folks like James Comey, Andrew McCabe, John Brennan destroyed the credibility of the FBI and our justice system as effectively. We now have an infinite downside on this nation. It’s unsustainable. And the one method you clear up it’s with info, and transparency, and hearings, and investigations. It’s not quackery, it’s not conspiracy idea. It’s what’s going to be required.

TODD: Let me ask you this. Then why didn’t you maintain hearings in regards to the 9/11 truthers? There’s loads of individuals who thought 9/11 was an inside job. So that you’re mainly saying is that if there’s sufficient individuals who consider a conspiracy idea, if there’s sufficient individuals who maintain, how in regards to the Moon touchdown? Are you going to carry hearings on that?

JOHNSON: There are every kind of issues that I’d like to carry hearings on. You must sort of choose and select primarily based on priorities. Proper now, we have now this election. We’ve received tens of tens of millions of Individuals that suppose this election was stolen. We have to get the underside of it. Once more, what’s defined, we have to clarify it, get that off the desk. We additionally must acknowledge there have been some actual issues right here. There’s some points that have to be explored and investigated.

TODD: You’ve received to ask your self while you inform folks one million occasions that one thing was stolen or one thing was fraud after which they consider it, I feel you want to look within the mirror and ask your self why so many individuals believed it.

JOHNSON: Nicely, Chuck, you want to take a look at your mirror since you carried the Democrats’ water on the entire Russian collusion with the Trump marketing campaign hoax —

TODD: Sen. Johnson, I’ve received to go. I recognize you approaching. I’ve allow you to, I’ve allow you to say loads of —

JOHNSON: That’s what you probably did within the media. You carried that water for years. You destroyed the credibility of the press, not me.

TODD: Sen. Johnson, aside from, aside from crediting you for approaching, I recognize that as a result of solely two of your colleagues had the heart to say sure this weekend about this conspiracy idea that you simply’re engaged on.

Media Analysis Heart Vice President Brent Baker explains our weekly choose: “Todd couldn’t have been extra smug and sanctimonious towards a visitor as he used his platform to discredit and mock a U.S. senator with whom he disagrees. Fairly an egregious abuse of Todd’s journalistic function, particularly because it’s very exhausting to think about him ever displaying such disdain towards a liberal visitor, and yet one more instance of why Trump supporters don’t belief the ‘mainstream media.’”

Ranking: 5 out of 5 SCREAMS.

 

 

> Liberal Media Scream posts for 2020.

> For all of 2019.

> For all of 2018.

> For July through December 2017.

> For January through June 2017.

> For July through December 2016.

> For January through June 2016.

> For July to December 2015.

 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *